There is precious little good data in nutrition science. Every study I’ve seen shows poor statistical methods, conflicts with other studies, or does not show statistically significant results, usually all three. It’s a difficult field because there are simply too many variables and the parameters are difficult to control precisely. This is why diets are fads. I decided to ditch nutrition and focus on biology. The proportions in Soylent are loosely based off the recommendations of the FDA, though I added a couple extras and changed a few based on my testing. Here is what the body needs.
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- Doomsday clock: We are closer to doom than at any time since the Cold War, say scientists – Science – News – The Independent
- Davos: Fear ascendant
- The Pillars of Creation show their dark side › News in Science (ABC Science)
- Cold climate animals may suffer as world heats up › News in Science (ABC Science)
- The tools needed to seek out new worlds out there in space
- Humanity is in the existential danger zone, study confirms
- Obituaries for coral reefs may be premature, study finds
- Wave energy & desalination plant nears completion in Western Australia.
- Farm catalogues from a bygone era now sought by National Library – ABC Rural (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
- Water Source for Almonds in California May Run Dry – NYTimes.com
-
Links
